Protein cleavage generates functional diversity on the surface of bacterial pathogens  — ASN Events

Protein cleavage generates functional diversity on the surface of bacterial pathogens  (#34)

Steven P Djordjevic 1
  1. University of Technology, Sydney, Broadway, NSW, Australia

Bacterial pathogens are known to post-translationally cleave large mass, surface molecules during maturation but the extent to which processing occurs on the cell surface has largely remained unexplored. We have been characterising post-translational cleavage events in cell surface proteins produced by several pathogenic mycoplasma species. Cell shaving and cell surface biotinylation protocols in combination with LC-MS/MS and 2D-PAGE have been used to generate comprehensive datasets that identify the complement of cell surface proteins and predict cleavage sites, such as the now well-characterised S/T-X-F↓X-D/E motif found in the P97 and P102 adhesin families (1-7). Our complementary, orthogonal approaches show that adhesins, lipoproteins, non-classically secreted proteins, and proteins predicted by PSORTb to localise to the cytosol can be cleaved. To investigate the functional significance of protein processing, we have developed a series of affinity-capture protocols using heparin, fibronectin, plasminogen, actin and host epithelial cell surface antigens as bait (1-7). Cleavage fragments representing different regions of the same molecule have been shown to bind to different extracellular matrix components and host surface-associated molecules (1-7). Independent studies show that these interactions occur with physiologically relevant binding affinities suggesting that processing may be a mechanism to increase the repertoire of functionally diverse proteins on the cell surface of these genome-reduced pathogens.

  1. Bogema et al., 2011. Journal of Biological Chemistry 286:41217
  2. Bogema et al., 2012. mBio 3(2) doi:10.1128/mBio.00282-11.
  3. Deutscher et al., 2012. Journal of Proteome Research. 11:1924
  4. Seymour et al., 2012. Cellular Microbiology.14: 81
  5. Raymond et al., 2013. Journal of Proteome Research 12:5891
  6. Tacchi et al., 2014. Journal of Proteome Research 13:2920
  7. Raymond et al., 2015. Cellular Microbiology. In Press